Christian Foundations examines Evolution vs. Creation: The Great Debate
We have been examining the Four greatest challenges to the Christian faith: Humanism, Evolution, False religions and the New Age.
The Following article has been reprinted with permission from the ‘All About Creation’ Website. It contains more information that can add to your knowledge about this great debate. I have also used their website for our ‘Website of the Month’ post. Enjoy!
*******
You are here: Creation >> Creation Vs. Evolution
Evolution vs. Creation: The Great Debate
The Evolution vs. Creation debate is often referred to as the “Great Debate.” It’s the emotion-packed question of “Origins” — why, how, and where did everything come from?
20th century science has made the compelling discovery that, at some point, the universe began. Both sides of the Great Debate now agree that the universe has not existed eternally. However, this is where the agreement ends. As far as the “why” and “how” of the “origin event,” this is where the division and contention begin.
There are two basic theories in this Great Debate. The first is the historical default – the Creation Model of Origins. This theory maintains that the intricate design permeating all things implies a Designer. The second theory is the more recent, atheistic explanation – the Evolution Model of Origins. This theory postulates that the intricate design permeating all things is a product of random chance and excessive time.
Evolution vs. Creation: The Contentions
Evolution vs. Creation is indeed the Great Debate of our scientific times. In any scientific debate, the theories must be tested according to the evidence. We propose that the burden of evidence should be upon the Evolutionists, since Creation has been the historic and inherent default throughout virtually all cultures and religions until roughly the last 200 years.
Of course, Evolutionists, who view themselves as the only “scientists” in the debate, insist that the burden of evidence be upon the Creationists. Evolutionists reason, we cannot see the Creator, we cannot hear the Creator, and we cannot touch, taste or smell the Creator. Therefore, we are unable to test for the Creator with any form of scientific equipment developed thus far.
Creationists retort, we cannot see, hear, touch, taste, or smell the human mind. We cannot test for the human mind with any form of scientific equipment developed thus far. When we run an electroencephalogram, we are measuring salt flow and electrical activity within the human brain. We cannot so much as even locate the human mind. Yet we watch as human carcasses run about, making order of disorder, conscious decisions according to subconscious criteria.
We see the design and complexity that result from the operation of the brain through the invisible realm known as the mind. Thus, we know with certainty that the human mind exists.
Therefore, it’s absolutely logical for Creationists to postulate the existence of a Creator based upon the same “evidence.” The design we see all around us came from one, grand concept, and such a concept can only come from a complex Mind. Furthermore, the mathematical and physical laws inherent in all things (including, most dramatically, the Laws of Thermodynamics and the Law of Cause and Effect) effectively validate this evidentiary claim.
Evolution vs. Creation: Origins
In the Evolution vs. Creation conflict, Evolutionists do quite well in terms of theoretical science, but fail to find empirical evidence. Evolutionists theorize that the universe, with all that it contains (space, time, matter and energy), exploded from nothing.
This is contrary to the First Law of Thermodynamics. Where did space, time, matter and energy come from in the first place? Thus, for Evolutionists, the ultimate question of Origins remains unsolved. To complicate the Evolutionary position, this original explosion of everything from nothing is unable to explain all of the complexity and fine-tuning in the universe, including cosmic “voids” and “clumps”, retrograde motion of the galaxies, etc.
Despite numerous problems, this explosion from nothing has been dubbed the “Big Bang” and is the accepted theory among the majority of Evolutionists. Evolution is a very unique “science.” Typically, scientists observe evidentiary data and then formulate their conclusions. Evolutionists have formulated their conclusion, and now look for the missing data.
Evolution vs. Creation: Complexity
The Evolution vs. Creation debate further seeks to solve the riddle of complexity. Creationists believe the universe was designed to be complex by an Intelligent Designer. Evolutionists, in their effort to exclude a designer, contend that complexity has developed from simplicity over time.
Evolutionists view time as their solution. However, hard science tells us that time is the enemy of complexity. This fact has been so well documented that it has obtained the stature of a physical law, the “Second Law of Thermodynamics.”
Evolution vs. Creation: The Resolution
Evolution vs. Creation — Until Evolutionists find the evidence they’ve sought since the beginning of the modern Evolutionary movement about 150 years ago, there is actually no debate at all. Creation is the default.
Evolutionists insist that complexity developed from simplicity despite the contradiction to known physical laws. Moreover, Evolutionists maintain that this simplicity just sprang into existence without any cause at all. Let’s collect the evidence, and then we can start a debate.
*******
We trust this has added to your understanding of the debate between Evolution and the Challenge it poses to our Christion Foundations.
Join me in our next post as we continue to explore the debate and hopefully find an answer for your faith,
Susnne Fengler, Blog Author
www.christianfoundations.jesus-treeoflife.info
Tags: Debate-Creation vrs Evolution
Filed under: Challenges to the Christian Faith
43.I’d have to check with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!